grams., geographical region, measurement regarding MA, measurement from math performance, intercourse, levels peak, and you will guide year), i held the new heterogeneity attempt. The fresh Q test (heterogeneity test) are finding the distinctions one of impression items, hence to explore and that prospective moderator (we.age., investigation possess) might have starred a job within these distinctions try requisite.

Geographical Region

Geographic regions had been believed a prospective average grounds. The end result sizes were categorized to your five broad teams: You, Europe, China or other counties. Brand new mathematical heterogeneity one of several impression brands was revealed (Q = , p = 0.01). Particularly, the studies which have Far-eastern examples met with the largest impact size (r = ?0.41), because the training having European examples showed the tiniest impression dimensions (r = ?0.21). On the other hand, the studies with our company products had a more impressive effect size (roentgen = ?0.30) compared to the corresponding classification when you look at the European countries, as they had an inferior feeling proportions versus corresponding classification inside Asia.

Sex

The reasonable analyses with the gender was conducted by way of several strategies. Basic, the category about varying are in keeping with Ma’s (1999) research, and we compared perhaps the math anxiety-efficiency connect is rather various other certainly one of around three classes (male, people, and you may mixed); the outcome suggested there were zero distinctions one of several three kinds (Q = 4.62, p = 0.099). 2nd, this research had a tendency to stretch after hookup ban kaldırma that to test when you should prohibit the mistake effect regarding blended classification and you will if the mediocre correlations ranging from men and women was basically somewhat some other. Only 7 knowledge that provided new correlation between MA and you will math efficiency otherwise vital information would be moved to impression systems getting various other genders was integrated. The results suggested no factor between girls (roentgen = ?0.30) and you may males (r = ?0.18) (Q = dos.73, p = 0.098).

Amount Level

Five level-level organizations had been molded within meta-analysis, in addition to a simple classification, junior large class, senior high group, blend category, and college group. The outcomes recommended which changeable had tall outcomes into mathematics anxiety-show link (Q = , p = 0.02). Much more specifically, brand new senior high classification encountered the premier mathematics anxiety-abilities connect (roentgen = ?0.44), followed by the newest junior high classification (roentgen = ?0.39), university (r = ?0.33), primary (roentgen = ?0.27), and combined classification, which had the littlest math anxiety-abilities hook (roentgen = ?0.21).

Publication Years

The present day meta-investigation consisted of committed frame regarding 19 ages (2000–2018). To check whether or not go out got an effect on brand new math stress-overall performance connect, an effective Pearson relationship are conducted between the book years while the of the many private training (r = 0.twenty seven, p > 0.05). No correlation try discovered between perception systems in addition to book years (Figure cuatro).

Measurement away from MA

I plus searched whether or not the balances used to sample math stress got an effect on the latest math nervousness-efficiency hook. The results suggested that measurement out of MA didn’t come with impact on the mathematics stress-results link (Q = six.54, p = 0.48). Especially, personal knowledge that used almost every other balances (age.grams., the newest Math Nervousness Size for Primary College or university People [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] had the premier mathematics anxiety-efficiency hook (r = ?0.41), followed closely by studies that used the latest MAS (roentgen = ?0.40), MARS (roentgen = ?0.35), MAQ (roentgen = ?0.28), MASYC (r = ?0.26), CMAQ (roentgen = ?0.24), SEMA (r = ?0.24), and you will AMAS (roentgen = ?0.24), and private training that used the brand new MASC had the smallest mathematics anxiety-performance hook up (r = ?0.15).

Measurement from Math Abilities

The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).